ABSTRACT
Objective To establish a medical quality evaluation system for gynecology wards in specialized gynecology hospitals by means of DRGs. Methods DRGs method was used to adjust risks of the information of gynecology inpatients discharged in 2016. On such basis, the medical quality evaluation system was built on the three dimensions of medical ability, medical efficiency and medical safety, while a general scoring was obtained by multiplying the scoring of the dimension with its respective weighting coefficients. Results The general scoring of the 10 wards ranged between 0. 89-1. 08, averaging 0. 99. That of Ward B ranked the highest, and Ward I the lowest of the ten. The medical ability scoring ranged between 0. 87-1. 12, averaging 1. 00;That of Ward B ranked the highest,and Ward I the lowest of the ten. Medical efficiency scoring ranged between 0. 93 -1. 23, averaging 1. 00;That of Ward J ranked the highest,and Ward E the lowest of the ten. Safety scoring ranged between 0. 89-0. 99, averaging 0. 94; That of Ward F ranked the highest, and Ward A the lowest of the ten. Conclusions The medical quality evaluation system based on DRGs can effectively evaluate wards of a gynecology department, supporting their fine management.
ABSTRACT
Objective To establish a medical quality evaluation system for gynecology wards in specialized gynecology hospitals by means of DRGs. Methods DRGs method was used to adjust risks of the information of gynecology inpatients discharged in 2016. On such basis, the medical quality evaluation system was built on the three dimensions of medical ability, medical efficiency and medical safety, while a general scoring was obtained by multiplying the scoring of the dimension with its respective weighting coefficients. Results The general scoring of the 10 wards ranged between 0. 89-1. 08, averaging 0. 99. That of Ward B ranked the highest, and Ward I the lowest of the ten. The medical ability scoring ranged between 0. 87-1. 12, averaging 1. 00;That of Ward B ranked the highest,and Ward I the lowest of the ten. Medical efficiency scoring ranged between 0. 93 -1. 23, averaging 1. 00;That of Ward J ranked the highest,and Ward E the lowest of the ten. Safety scoring ranged between 0. 89-0. 99, averaging 0. 94; That of Ward F ranked the highest, and Ward A the lowest of the ten. Conclusions The medical quality evaluation system based on DRGs can effectively evaluate wards of a gynecology department, supporting their fine management.